Not every true story is true
22 Jul 2026 
Russ Matthews History has always fascinated filmmakers, particularly when it centres on powerful leaders who shape the course of nations. The Wizard of the Kremlin ventures into that territory, blending real historical figures with fictional storytelling to imagine the rise of modern Russia through the eyes of a political strategist working behind the scenes. The result is an intriguing premise that never quite decides whether it wants to be satire, political commentary or historical drama.
Adapted from Giuliano da Empoli’s bestselling French novel, the film follows Vadim Baranov (Paul Dano), a fictional political advisor whose career intertwines with the rise of Vladimir Putin (Jude Law). As Russia emerges from the chaos following the collapse of the Soviet Union, Baranov becomes one of the architects of a new political machine built on image, influence and carefully managed perception. Yet as power grows, so too does the moral cost of helping shape a nation’s future.
One of the film’s greatest strengths is its cast. Paul Dano delivers another thoughtful and restrained performance, capturing a man who is never entirely comfortable with the world he is helping to create. Jude Law avoids caricature in portraying Putin, presenting a measured and quietly intimidating figure whose authority rarely needs to be announced. Alicia Vikander is equally compelling, bringing warmth and humanity to a story that often feels emotionally cold. While Jeffrey Wright is wasted as an unexplained character who is left to be a forgotten footnote and mere narrative support.
Unfortunately, the film itself proves more elusive than its performances.
Despite being marketed in some circles as political satire, there is remarkably little humour to be found. Instead, The Wizard of the Kremlin unfolds as a slow, sombre examination of political power that often feels more oppressive than insightful. At times it is difficult to know exactly what the filmmakers are trying to say. Is this a condemnation of authoritarianism? A critique of modern Russia? Or simply a fictional imagining of how influence operates behind closed doors?
That ambiguity becomes increasingly frustrating because the film’s fictional framework is so closely intertwined with real historical events. Audiences unfamiliar with the source novel could easily mistake large portions of the narrative for documented history rather than speculative fiction inspired by actual political figures. Rather than clarifying that distinction, the film often blurs the line even further.
The pacing also works against it. While the subject matter is undeniably fascinating, the story becomes increasingly heavy as one political crisis follows another. The absence of humour, hope or genuine emotional connection makes the experience feel longer than its running time, leaving viewers admiring the performances more than enjoying the film itself.
The Wizard of the Kremlin certainly provokes thought, but it rarely rewards the audience emotionally. Its exploration of power is compelling in places, yet its uncertain identity ultimately prevents it from becoming either an effective satire or an engaging political drama.
REEL DIALOGUE: Who can you really trust?
One of the most unsettling aspects of The Wizard of the Kremlin is that almost every relationship is transactional. Loyalty shifts. Truth becomes negotiable. Friends become political assets. Everyone appears to be serving someone—or themselves.
It raises a timeless question.
Who can we really trust?
The Bible has a remarkably realistic understanding of human nature. It acknowledges that people often pursue power, protect themselves and place their own interests first. History repeatedly demonstrates how easily influence can become manipulation when truth is sacrificed for personal gain.
Yet Scripture doesn’t leave us cynical.
Rather than encouraging us to place our ultimate confidence in political leaders, institutions or even ourselves, it points us towards the unchanging character of God.
“Trust in the Lord with all your heart, and do not lean on your own understanding.” Proverbs 3:5
Unlike human rulers whose motives may change with circumstances, God’s character remains constant. His justice is not influenced by public opinion, and His promises are not rewritten to suit the moment.
Ultimately, the Christian faith doesn’t ask us to place our hope in governments or ideologies. It invites us to trust the One who demonstrated His love through Jesus Christ—a King whose authority is defined not by fear or manipulation, but by truth, humility and sacrificial love.
Where to look for more details: Proverbs 3:5–6; Psalm 118:8–9; John 14:6; Hebrews 13:8.
Reel Dialogue has entered the world of YouVersion: Download the app, dive into the plans, and engage with the Bible in a fresh and exciting way.
Reel Dialogue has entered the world of YouVersion: Download the app, dive into the plans, and engage.
